
@tosinolugbenga
Jack Dorsey’s Block just cut 4,000 people—about 40% of its workforce—and said it’s because AI can do the work. Not because they’re struggling. They’re doing fine. They’re doing it because they think they can.
That’s the part that sticks. It’s not “we had to.” It’s “we chose to.”
For years we’ve been told AI will change work. We’ve heard about truck drivers, cashiers, paralegals. It felt distant. Then a big, profitable fintech company decides to shrink by nearly half, and the stock goes up 25%. Investors like it. The message is clear: fewer people plus AI equals “efficiency.”
Dorsey said most companies will probably do something similar in the next year. He might be right. Once one major player does it and gets rewarded, others follow. That’s how markets work.
The uncomfortable part is that this isn’t about bad companies or bad CEOs. It’s about incentives. If you can cut costs, keep output, and get a stock bump, the system pushes you to do it. The people who lose their jobs aren’t “inefficient.” They’re just on the wrong side of a new equation.
So what happens next?
Some jobs will disappear. Not all of them, but many. The ones that go first are the ones that are repetitive, rule-based, or easy to automate. Support, ops, some middle management. The kind of work that feels like “process” more than “judgment.”
New jobs will appear. They always do. But they won’t be a one-for-one swap. The person who used to process invoices might not become the person who trains the AI. The transition will be messy. Some people will retrain. Others won’t. Some industries will adapt. Others will hollow out.
The real question isn’t whether AI will cause job loss. It will. The question is what we do about it. Do we treat this as a private-sector problem—everyone for themselves—or as something that needs policy, safety nets, and maybe a different idea of what “work” means?
Block’s severance—20 weeks, healthcare, some transition support—is better than nothing. It’s still not a plan for a world where “efficiency” keeps meaning fewer people.
We’re not at the end of this. We’re at the beginning. The Block layoffs are a signal. How we respond to that signal will matter more than the layoffs themselves.
Other articles you might enjoy