In a country where average income is less than $5,000 per year, how exactly should people afford a ₦50m to ₦500m house?

Yet, there is hope. 👇👇

.

What I learnt working across housing planning, design, development, & sales, for more than a decade and half is the biggest divide between housing supply & demand is finance.

Housing supply is a based on production costs, while demand is based on income.
But income in Nigeria (mostly less than $5000/year) just can't absorb production costs.

At least, not at a 25-million-deficit scale.
And until we confront this (income-to-cost) mismatch honestly, we will keep "playing".
.

So what do we do? Empower people directly, through:
👉 Economic empowerment
👉 Increased access to land ownership
👉 Responsive city planning

But then, waiting government is unrealistic. The government alone can not close this gap. The scale is too large, and the fiscal reality doesn’t support it.

Which means we need to look inward.
.

So here's a thought…

Nigerians already have something powerful: Social communities. We are a society built on relationships & social networks.
From Esusu systems, cooperatives, age-grade associations, informal savings groups. et.c

So, what if we restructured these for housing?

Instead of one person trying to
🚩 Buy land alone,
🚩 Navigate approvals alone,
🚩 Hire consultants alone, &
🚩 Finance construction alone…

We restructure the social communities intentionally for pooling resources (cash, labor, technical knowledge et.c) within small groups to reduce individual burden.

This small group shares the:
📍 Land acquisition costs
📍 Approval and design fees
📍 Engineering/design services
📍 Construction overhead

And what would have cost one individual 10x more becomes 100x manageable.

… This is community-led housing.
.

But, community-led housing is not a new idea.
It just makes sense & www.petithaus.com already built systems for this to work in Lagos.

That, while we can not control land price volatility, inflation, exchange rates, minimum wage, or material costs...
We can control structure.

That way, we leverage numbers, trust, & existing relationships, something we already understand culturally.
And in many ways, it is more realistic than waiting for government housing to magically close a 25m deficit.
.

Lest I forget,
For this to work, the people, (not the government or politicians) must be ready to embrace a new attitude & attitude to property ownership.

If we continue approaching housing as an individual sport in a low-income economy, affordability will remain out of reach for most.
But if we start viewing housing as a coordinated, community-enabled process, we may begin to bridge the supply-demand divide in ways that reflect our economic reality.

The key to unlocking this is collaboration. And perhaps 'building together to help more people afford housing" is the way to bridge the housing deficit.